NOTABLE LINKED RESEARCH
Social Cyber Institute researchers and Fellows publish their work in external sources, such as book publishers, think tanks and journals on a wide range of interests, often in edited or co-edited volumes. This list includes publications involving SCI researchers or Fellows since they joined the Social Cyber Institute in some capacity.
The five generations of facial recognition usage and the Australian Privacy law (International Data Privacy Law, June ​2024)
​
This article co-authored by Jorge Conde of ANU and Professor Dan Svantesson describes the advances in face mining technologies and aligns these with Australian data privacy law, explaining the division of facial recognition usage into five generations. The article analyses the risks and gaps in data privacy laws, particularly within the Australian context, and offers recommendations for reform. Australian law regulates biometric data, including facial biometric data (FBD), as sensitive information. However, the legislation and regulatory focus are primarily on what may be termed the second-generation use of FBD; that is, for automated verification or identification. Australia is undergoing a reform of its data privacy law, which may impact the regulation of FBD. The reform proposals include redefining personal information to include inferred information and creating a non-exhaustive list of personal information types. The reform also suggests updating the categories of sensitive information and considering the regulation of biometric technologies.
This IISS Research Report concludes that the United States enjoys a comfortable lead over China in quantum-sensing research-and-development owing in large part to the much-larger scale of US efforts, their relative quality, the longer institutional development of research and education capabilities, and the superiority of the US quantum-sensing industry. This report compares the research-and-development capabilities of the United States and China in the field of quantum sensing. It concludes that in the coming decade, Washington will likely be significantly better placed than Beijing to achieve and deploy breakthroughs in this technology for national-security purposes.
Impact of the Ukraine War on National Cyber Policy: A Survey of Ten Countries (IISS, January 2024)
This survey of ten countries shows how radically they have reacted to the unprecedented cyber operations of the Russia–Ukraine war. The report also flags important lessons about the strategic character of cyber operations in modern war. Russia’s war against Ukraine has involved the most extensive and continuous use of hostile cyber operations by one state against another in history. What has the world learnt about cyber power as a result? This paper explores how ten countries – Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States – have responded to the war in the cyber domain.